Please read our Terms of Service if this is your first time using the Pensieve.
Char wrote:
I special ordered MuggleNet’s book because I don’t live in America. I received it the other day, and I have to say, I really enjoyed it too, Steve. In a word, it is “Fun”
— July 21, 2009 @ 6:42 am
Snuffles wrote:
I always thought Harry would die in the end, well once the prophecy was revealed anyways. I never thought she would not deliver the final tragedy that we were all expecting after the books that just put it out there. Evil sometimes wins and life is not full of fluffy bunnies.
— July 21, 2009 @ 5:49 pm
Seamus wrote:
Harry Potter Should Have Died is a very good book. I recommend it to anyone who wants a good book that discusses some very interesting topics. I loved it.
— July 25, 2009 @ 8:42 am
Brian Whittle wrote:
I am not a great fan of the “tragic hero” thing. Harry had a hard life until the end of book 7 to bump him off then would be sad.
— August 5, 2009 @ 10:23 am
yDouCare wrote:
harry most definitly should NOT have died. The series is an escapist and the point of it is to portray a world in which justice wins over.
— September 3, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
yDouCare wrote:
What?! What happened to my post?!
— September 3, 2009 @ 10:16 pm
yDouCare wrote:
Never mind. I thought…nothing.
— September 3, 2009 @ 10:17 pm
TS wrote:
I had read neither. But I loved your short kind of analysis. And for Harry, It’s depend of the day but there’s one thing that disturb me. Where was the point in killing him and ressucite him after? If not to please as much fan JKR could?
— March 9, 2010 @ 9:40 pm
Sher wrote:
Seriously, TS? You did read the book? Harry was a horcrux- if that part of him wasn’t killed, Voldy never would have been truly defeated. That was why she had him “killed.” It wasn’t about pleasing any of the fan base, it was part of the story.
— May 6, 2010 @ 5:52 pm
Leave your thoughts
Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Char wrote:
I special ordered MuggleNet’s book because I don’t live in America. I received it the other day, and I have to say, I really enjoyed it too, Steve. In a word, it is “Fun”
— July 21, 2009 @ 6:42 am
Snuffles wrote:
I always thought Harry would die in the end, well once the prophecy was revealed anyways. I never thought she would not deliver the final tragedy that we were all expecting after the books that just put it out there. Evil sometimes wins and life is not full of fluffy bunnies.
— July 21, 2009 @ 5:49 pm
Seamus wrote:
Harry Potter Should Have Died is a very good book. I recommend it to anyone who wants a good book that discusses some very interesting topics. I loved it.
— July 25, 2009 @ 8:42 am
Brian Whittle wrote:
I am not a great fan of the “tragic hero” thing. Harry had a hard life until the end of book 7 to bump him off then would be sad.
— August 5, 2009 @ 10:23 am
yDouCare wrote:
harry most definitly should NOT have died. The series is an escapist and the point of it is to portray a world in which justice wins over.
— September 3, 2009 @ 10:15 pm
yDouCare wrote:
What?! What happened to my post?!
— September 3, 2009 @ 10:16 pm
yDouCare wrote:
Never mind. I thought…nothing.
— September 3, 2009 @ 10:17 pm
TS wrote:
I had read neither. But I loved your short kind of analysis. And for Harry, It’s depend of the day but there’s one thing that disturb me. Where was the point in killing him and ressucite him after? If not to please as much fan JKR could?
— March 9, 2010 @ 9:40 pm
Sher wrote:
Seriously, TS? You did read the book? Harry was a horcrux- if that part of him wasn’t killed, Voldy never would have been truly defeated. That was why she had him “killed.” It wasn’t about pleasing any of the fan base, it was part of the story.
— May 6, 2010 @ 5:52 pm